Arming a violent drug addict in pre-trial custody is a SCOTUS case?!?
Far-right Nationalists continue to concoct cases for a corrupt SCOTUS.
The alleged gun rights case going to SCOTUS is just another Supreme Court case that is made up out of whole cloth. I explained in an earlier essay that this is the patented process for Theocratic-Nationalists. This is just more of the falsely constructed and sick far-right utopia bullshit being marketed to the gullible and the dullwitted. There is not an issue for which the far-right nutjobs will stop their disinformation and propaganda, especially to sell themselves to the violent insurrectionist militias and the equally fucktarded gun fetishists. Oh, and those who are too dumb to figure out what the hell is really going on in America.
A firearm is just a tool. Full stop. Gun fetishists think a firearm is a magic utopia-building device (you know, once you place the last of the Infinity Stones in the gauntlet. FFS.) That is some daft thinking. I carried a gun for many years, and I have handled every pistol, submachine gun, and carbine in the military or paramilitary inventory, including allied weapon systems. I created no utopias nor did I claim or think that creating a utopia with a gunshot was even possible. The gun fetishists have created their own fucked up reality about what a gun is and what it is capable of doing.
Before any of you fucktarded losers claim I am “anti-gun,” I have been a gun owner for over 40 years. I carried 24x7x365 while working undercover for the Army and as a civilian peace officer. One exception, I never ever carried if the boys and girls were going out drinking. Ethanol and guns do not mix. Never carry and drink. That’s one of the hard and fast rules of life. My old EDC: an FBI model S&W 1079 10mm with hand-loaded +P rounds. If pro-gun means arming violent domestic violence suspects (who are often cop assaulters or cop killers) plus arming the street gangs, rapists, and the cartels, then fuck you, I am not “pro-gun” in the idiotic Nationalist absolutist sense. Absolutely not. Y’all are ideological morons with the absolutely arming the dangerously stupid stance.
SCOTUS is about to hear a gun rights case from far-right gun fetishists that is probably the most dangerous political-legal stunt of my lifetime. The gun fetish absolutists are clambering to arm known, dangerous, drug-addicted, violent criminal suspects. What the far-right maniacs are doing here is reverse engineering their own court decisions using the worst-case scenarios possible.
Every far-right loonie group, including the queen of the right-wing nutters Phyllis Schlafly (seriously, WTF, she is demented) is going to the mat on a daftly described gun rights case that involved a patently dangerous and psychotic soon-to-be convicted felon. All far-right legal resources have been engaged to ensure an asshole who committed five gun-related crimes in just two months has his gun fetish preserved under a SCOTUS decision and enshrined into law. (read: A decision most likely, like Dobbs and others, that has already been decided behind closed doors years ago...)
In this specific case, they are “protecting the rights” of one Zackey Rahimi — a serial offender, a violent armed criminal suspect with five separate gun violence incidents, and a domestic abuser. This criminal mental case is such a shithead felon, he wrote a letter to the judge stating he was a criminal shithead and did not want to ever carry a gun again (so, yeah, get his case to SCOTUS!) WTAFO.
Wow! One dude commits FIVE gun crimes in two months and there wasn’t a single good guy in Texas to stop him. Who is surprised? Seriously, all the good guys missed this FIVE times? Posers. Uvalde Part Deux for now two months? Interesting.
What the American Nazis want is chaos and violence so they can point to the chaos, “See what [whomever they hate this week] did!!!”
Yes. The lion's share of Nationalist legal resources is being applied to ensure a violent soon-to-be felon with multiple gun charges has the right to have a gun while on a domestic violence restraining order after repeated beatings of his girlfriend and even more violence against other women. Five separate gun crimes and the Fourth Reich numbnuts are fighting to give an AR-15 to a mental case and a violent felon who wants to murder his lover. Can’t you see the utopia in all of this?!? Goddamn, this is incredibly fucking stupid!!!
Even though at face value this is fucking absurd, SCOTUS is hearing the case and will, almost guaranteed, find that a violent, mentally-questionable drug-addled arrestee on felony charges has absolute gun rights. Rahimi beat his girlfriend (with whom he has a child) in a parking lot, threw her into a car while continuing to beat her, then took out a pistol and shot at bystanders/witnesses.
Of course!!!! Hand him his gun back!!!! OF COURSE!!!! WTAFO x 10^9.
Give him his gun back even though a local judge put a two-year restraining order on Rahimi and the judge stated he thought Rahimi’s armed violence would “likely to occur again in the future.” OF COURSE!!! Hand him another firearm, you fucking dolts. Why?? Because Rahimi has targeted other women with a firearm and was arrested again and again and again, so of course, hand him another firearm, even load it for him and cock the hammer why don’t you?!?
I just want to fucking scream at this point because this is so fucking grossly imbecilic.
You know when they searched Rahimi’s home, they found a shitload of guns right next to the domestic restraining order. Six violent incidents, multiple assaults with a deadly weapon (firearm), brandishing (firearm), and domestic violence (with a firearm involved), but he can’t be told he can’t have a gun. Now the lobbyists and fetishists are claiming Rahimi (and other violent criminals) have no legal process for a restraining order. That’s rubbish, a bald-faced lie. Rahimi had his hearings, this is bullshit.
In this case, the far-right wants more violence, including a dead girlfriend and a couple of dead cops as well. Again, the violence is a foundation for a lectern rant about what “Antifa” or “woke” is doing and how they are ruining the country. Give me a freakin’ break here.
What legal theory are they using to hand a violent criminal his guns back??? I am not kidding, Since no one said you could take a firearm away from mental cases in the 1700s, we can’t do it today. They are building a pattern here: In the Dobbs case, a guy who believed in witches in the 1800s thought X, so we can’t dispute X today. Since the guy who was afraid of witches (not a real thing) did not know about modern medicine or OB-GYN care, we can’t dispute the moron from the 1800s who did not know shit from Shinola. The far-right did the same thing in the mifepristone case, “it is not in the Bible,” so dismiss all modern knowledge and medicine for a medieval construct being put forth as a pre-approved legal canard.
Let’s have some facts here: Arresting domestic violence suspects and tossing their asses in the pokey has been shown to reduce further domestic violence incidents. Seizing guns out of the home where domestic violence has occurred reduces domestic aggravated assaults and domestic homicides. But that does not matter to the far-right choas crew.
Why does it not matter to the far-right??? They believe the right people are dying of gun violence. They see random gun violence by the criminally insane as a win. Their kids did not get slaughtered at Sandy Hook or Uvalde, so they simply don’t care at a sociopathic level.
Are the far-right lobbyists going to protect Rahimi’s “rights” to thermite?? Explosives?? Chemical weapons like a bleach bomb??? A halberd????
Nope. Just the “rights” of a violent fucktarded criminal to possess the product the lobbyists make money selling guns to criminals just like Rahimi.
How is this a SCOTUS case?!? Well, in the same manner the corporate protectionism racket works in general. Whether it is Citizens United or Dobbs, the far-right signal boosts the lamest legal theories to protect their profits at your expense. There are also other Fourth Reich-minded benefits: American Nazis get to whine about crime (after openly arming the criminals) and then get to budget more police tanks in every American town. Bringing the wars home has been the quiet part for years. Lately, they are saying those quiet things aloud during an angry rant.
The Somiliafication of America has been the far-right gun kook’s goal for at least a couple of decades.
That’s why this is a SCOTUS case. If you think it has a single thing to do with “constitutional rights,” you must be one of the dumb fuckers who believe in utopias.